I was hired by the LA Times to perform a forensic audio investigation on a 2001 recording of a jaywalking citation being given to Ted Rall. The LA Times posted my results in an recent article to clarify the reasons behind Ted Rall?s dismissal from the paper. Ted Rall has since posted a rebuttal to this article on his blog, in which he made various claims about the results of my investigation. I would like to clear any confusion or misinterpretations about my forensic investigation and the results it produced. In the list below I have outlined points which I believe address the issues Mr. Rall published in his article:
- I did not hear a crowd of people on the audio recording that I enhanced of former Los Angeles Times freelancer Ted Rall being ticketed by an officer for jaywalking. I heard two people other than Rall and the officer talking on the recording. At most, I could make out the word ?jaywalking? being spoken by one of the two people. I did not hear anything about “handcuffs” on Rall?s enhanced version of the recording or on the version that I enhanced.
- We have an established chain of custody of this recording by the Los Angeles Police Department since officer Willie Durr recorded it in 2001.
- We have no signs of tampering anywhere in the recording. I found no evidence of tampering when I performed my authentication test.